Posted on

Timelines for obtaining import license for medical devices including IVD’s in India

The import of medical devices including in-vitro medical devices (hereinafter referred to as “medical devices”) in India is regulated by India’s central medical device regulator, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). In order to import a medical device into India, the importer has to make an application for import license Form MD-14 of Medical Devices Rules, 2017 (MDR, 2017) before CDSCO. Once the application is processed successfully, the CDSCO grants an import license to the importer in Form MD-15 of MDR, 2017.

Since 1st April 2020, all medical devices (including its accessories and components) are regulated as drugs in India. An import license has been made mandatory to import medical devices depending on its risk classification from the following dates:

  • For Class A and Class B medical devices: 1st October 2022
  • For Class C and Class D medical devices: 1st October 2023

In the paragraphs below, we have answered some of the common questions regarding timelines for obtaining import license for medical devices on the basis of our working knowledge of the law and prevailing practice.

1.  What is the usual time within which an import licence may be granted by CDSCO?

The prescribed timeline for issuance of import license is nine (09) months from the date of application. However, the timeline is suspended if a query on the application is raised by CDSCO.

2. What is the approximate timeline for receiving query from CDSCO on the import license application?

As per current estimate, a query is typically received within a span of 3-4 months from the date of import license application. Please note that CDSCO may raise multiple rounds of queries.

3. How much time does an applicant of import license gets to reply to the queries?

The general expectation of CDSCO is that the queries should be responded within forty-five days from the date of receipt of queries.

4. What happens if a query cannot be responded within 45 days?

If the applicant is facing a difficulty in replying to the query, an intimation may be sent to CDSCO justifying the reason for delay and providing appropriate undertaking.

5. What is the maximum time within which queries have to be responded?

There is no official time limit for responding to the queries which has been stipulated by CDSCO. However, the expectation is to respond to the queries within the reasonable time frame.

6. What is the timeline by which the response to the queries is processed by CSDCO?

There is no prescribed timeline for processing the queries by CDSCO. However, the timeline for grant of import licence is nine (09) months from the date of filing of the application.

7. Is the time taken by the authorities to grant an import licence includes the time taken by the importer to respond to the queries?

No. The total timeline of nine months prescribed for grant of import license is not inclusive of the time taken by the importer to respond to the queries.

8. What is the time limit in which the importer can appeal to the Central Government in case the application is rejected by CSDCO?

If the application is rejected by CDSCO, the applicant may appeal to the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare within a period of forty-five days. The Secretary or another officer designated by the Secretary may, after conducting an enquiry into the matter as considered necessary, pass orders in relation to the appeal within a period of ninety days from the date of appeal.

9. What is the validity of import license granted in Form MD-15?

The licence granted by CDSCO under Form MD-15 is valid in perpetuity unless cancelled or surrendered. The validity of the license so granted is subject to the payment of the retention fee by the importer.

10. When is importer license retention fee due to be paid?

The retention fee to retain import license has to be paid by the importer every 5 years.

11. What if the importer of medical device fails to pay the retention fee within the prescribed time period?

If the import licence holder fails to pay the required retention fee on or before the prescribed due date, the license holder is required to pay a late fee in addition to the retention fee.

The late fee will be calculated at the rate of two per cent (2%) of the import license retention fee for every month or part thereof within ninety days. Non-payment of fee until expiry of ninety days will result in cancellation of the import license.

For any business-related queries please write to contact@arogyalegal.com

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS & POLICY UPDATES

Dear Reader, We are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

Human Rights body to probe sale of drugs with identical brand names in India
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India has taken suo motu cognizance of a newspaper report which stated that many drugs in India were being sold with identical brand names for treating different medical conditions. NHRC has issued notice to Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Central Drugs Regulator, asking for detailed report within four (04) weeks.
Source: bit.ly/3SB8WfB

India’s Environment Regulator to take action against unregistered recyclers and refurbisher of battery waste
India’s Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has issued direction to all State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) and Pollution Control Committees (PCCs) to ensure compliance with Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022 by recyclers and refurbishers of battery waste. CPCB has directed SPCB/PCC to carry out drives identifying informal / illegal battery waste recyclers, and physically verify facilities of existing waste recyclers. All battery waste recyclers and refurbishers are obligated to register under Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022.
Source: bit.ly/3OGJTGI

Difference of manufacturing process will not take away ability of manufacturer of product manufacturer to enforce product patent, if the product is covered by Product-by-Process Patent: High Court
The Delhi High Court of India has held that a product-by-process patent would be enforceable even if the alleged infringement relates to manufacturing of a product using process which is different than the one claimed in patent. The High Court was dealing with a matter relating to manufacture of a compound called Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) which was patented by the Innovator. The defendants had raised an argument that they are not covered by the patent because they were following a different process to manufacture FCM. However, the argument was rejected by the High Court.
Source: bit.ly/3OGtr9C

Manufacturers of medical devices who do not wish to disclose name and address of manufacturing facility, may apply for neutral code on central portal
The Indian medical devices regulator, Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) has direct all the manufacturers of medical devices for export purposes to submit the applications for neutral code through online system of medical devices portal only. If a neutral code is declared on the label of package, it does not have to bear the name and address of the manufacturer. The online portal is now functional to accept the applications.
Source: bit.ly/3SWgTxn

Recommendations for COVID legislation received from Law Commission of India
The Law Commission of India has submitted its report titled “A Comprehensive Review of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897″ to the Government of India. The commission has recommended either to amend the existing law or enact the new legislation to address the underlying gaps in the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. The 1897 was relied on by the Government of India to introduce various controls during the COVID pandemic, including lock downs.
Source: bit.ly/3SWMdMm