Posted on

The 90 Day Rule: Indian Drug and Medical Device Regulator (CDSCO) tightens query response timelines on applications 

India’s Central Drug and Medical Device Regulator, The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), has made it clear that it will reject product applications if the official queries to the applications are not responded within 90 days from the date of receipt of the first official reminder.

Background
On January 16, 2026, CDSCO issued a public notice informing the general public that it has initiated a time-bound reminder and rejection mechanism to ensure timely disposal of the pending applications. As per CDSCO, a large number of product applications across categories such as new drugs, cosmetics, biologics, medical devices and IVDs are pending since 8 to 10 years because of non- submission of responses to queries on product application raised on the official electronic submission portal (SUGAM portal).

In the notice, CDSCO issued a final warning to applicants whose application has been pending for more than two years for want of response to queries and who have received three reminders from CDSCO requesting submission of response to query. If such applicants fail to respond to queries within 30 days from date of public notice i.e. by 14 February 2026, it will result in rejection of the application.

The CDSCO also used the opportunity to inform the public that it has instituted a structured reminder mechanism for queries to applications under which it was going to issue three reminders to applicants in relation to unresponded queries. This structured reminder system and consequences of failing to respond to queries are discussed in the paragraphs below.

CDSCO’s Structured reminder mechanism
Under the structured reminder mechanism, CDSCO has decided that it will issue reminders at fixed intervals to applicants who do not respond to the official queries to an application in the following manner:

  • First Reminder- CDSCO will issue the first reminder if it does not receive response to query. The time-period that CDSCO will wait for response to queries before it issues the first reminder has not been specified.
  • Second reminder – If no response to queries is received within 30 days of first reminder, a second reminder will be issued o.
  • Third reminder – If no response to queries is received within 30 days of second reminder, a third and final reminder will be issued.
  • Disposal Notice – If no response to queries is received within 30 days of issuance of third reminder, CDSCO will issue dispose the application.

Will the disposal of application due to non-response to queries be treated as rejection of the application effectively barring the applicant to make the same application again?
The disposal by CDSCO should not be treated as rejection of the application. This means that the applicant should be able to apply for license again for the same products, even if the application for same products has been rejected before for want of response to queries.

Whether the government fees paid be refunded or reused or adjusted in case of disposal of application of CDSCO on grounds of non-response to queries?
As per the public notice, the government fees paid will not be refunded or reused or adjusted once the underlying application is disposed by CDSCO due to non-receipt of response to queries despite three reminders.

What will happen to product applications that are pending for more than two years?
Where an application has remained pending for over two years, but no queries have been raised by CDSCO, there is currently no clarity on how such cases will be treated. Based on the language and intent of the public notice, such applications should not be disposed, because the structured reminder mechanism gets triggered only when queries raised by CDSCO are not responded to by the applicants.
Where queries have been raised in the application, but the applicant is yet to receive three reminders from CDSCO as described in the structured reminder mechanism, it is unclear what will happen because the public notice does not provide any guidance on this issue. In our view, such applications should not get disposed by CDSCO for want of response since the disposal of application under the structured reminder mechanism can happen only after issuance of three reminders by CDSCO. However, CDSCO is free to follow its own processes and cannot be blamed for disposal of application without notice on the ground that the applicant has not responded to queries and appears to have abandoned the application.

Is it possible to seek extension of the timeline?
It is unclear whether CDSCO will entertain extension of timeline beyond the timeline of 90 days prescribed under the structured reminder mechanism. The Public Notice leaves some flexibility for making an application for extension of timeline. However, the final decision on extension of timeline beyond the 90 day window under the structured reminder mechanism will rest with CDSCO.

Is it possible to partly respond to CDSCO’s queries and respond to remainder of the queries later?
It is unclear whether CDSCO will entertain partial response to queries as sufficient to stop the 90 day clock under its structured reminder mechanism. However, in the event of time-crunch, it may be pragmatic to submit a partial response to queries than to submit no response at all.

What is timeline for CDSCO to issue queries after submission of an application?
CDSCO has not committed to a timeline to review application and issue queries to applicants.

What is the timeline within which an applicant must respond to queries raised on the application to avoid receipt of first reminder from CDSCO?
CDSCO has not indicated any expectation on timeline within which applicants should respond to its queries to avoid receiving the first reminder.

Will State Drug and Medical Device Licensing Authorities also follow structured reminder mechanism and dispose applications due to non-response to queries?
The State Drug and Medical Device Licensing Authorities are not bound to follow the structured reminder mechanism as published by CDSCO in its public notice. For all practical purposes, the structured reminder mechanism should be assumed to be applicable to CDSCO only.

There is a statutory timeline prescribed for processing most product license applications. What happens to the statutory timeline is the impact of query on statutory timeline of processing of an application?
The statutory timelines prescribed for processing drug, medical device or cosmetic license by CDSCO or State Licensing Authority are considered to be suspended upon receipt of queries from the regulatory authority.

Take-away for industry
It may be pragmatic for manufacturers and importers of drugs and medical device manufacturers to respond official queries received to their product applications at the earliest opportunity and in the best possible way, to avoid repeat queries or reminders from CDSCO. It is possible that some queries may require more time to respond than other queries, at which time appropriate regulatory strategy should be formulated to address all queries so as to avoid disposal or rejection of application and consequent loss of valuable time and government fees.

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

1. India’s Central Drug and Medical Device Regulator, The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), has issued a public notice that it will reject applications if the queries to the applications are not responded within 90 days from the date of receipt of the query on its official application portal called SUGAM portal. A time-bound reminder and rejection mechanism for timely disposal of the pending applications has been introduced. Applications pending for two years will now be rejected after 30 days notice if no response is submitted.
Source: h7.cl/1i6LX

2. India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry has extended the deadline for importers and manufacturers to obtain BIS certification for aluminium utensils and food and beverage cans covered under the Quality Control Order, 2026. The revised timelines are issued in a phase wise manner based on industry category, beginning from 1 October 2026.
Source: h7.cl/1i6L0

3. Several drug companies are cautious about a new fast approval program under the United States Food and Drug Administration. They fear quicker reviews may weaken scientific scrutiny, increase legal risk, and invite court challenges, even as others support faster access to important medicines for patients nationwide safely.
Source: h7.cl/1i6Lg

4. The Maharashtra Public Health Department has launched dedicated menopause clinics in Pune to provide specialised care for women’s physical and mental health needs. Weekly OPDs will be held every Wednesday at government hospitals, offering medical management, counselling, and lifestyle guidance. The initiative aims to address menopause-related health issues across urban and rural areas.
Source: h7.cl/1n5Uw

5. India’s Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare has announced that the Seed Act, 2026, to introduces a nationwide seed traceability through QR codes, mandate seed company registration, and impose penalties up to ₹30 lakh for substandard seeds, and safeguards the traditional seed systems and strengths transparency.
Source: h7.cl/1i6Lp

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

1. The Karnataka Health Department has proposed introducing QR codes on medicine strips and boxes to help visually impaired patients access key drug information via smartphone scanning under the IMPACT-VIP programme. Details such as dosage, composition, and expiry dates can be accessed, and the proposal may be sent to the Centre for wider implementation.
Source: h7.cl/1o2Wy

2. India’s central drugs regulatory authority (CDSCO) has released a draft guidance outlining regulatory requirements and online procedures for importing in-vitro diagnostic medical devices. The document aims to streamline approvals under Medical Devices Rules, 2017. Comments from stakeholders are invited within 15 days.
Source: h7.cl/1j0Wg

3. The Government of India has in the Union Budget 2026–27 announced measures to position India as a hub for medical tourism, biopharmaceutical manufacturing and traditional medicine. The government will establish five regional medical hubs, expand Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy infrastructure, and strengthen research, manufacturing capacity and employment across the healthcare value chain.
Source: h7.cl/1o2WE

4. The Government of India is planning to amend the Drugs and Cosmetics Act to tighten oversight of pharmaceutical opioids, proposing stricter penalties, higher fines, and enhanced monitoring of manufacturing and sales to curb misuse, diversion, and illegal distribution while strengthening regulatory enforcement.
Source: h7.cl/1j0Wr

5. Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission has issued a formal circular urging all Medical Device Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) to strictly comply with adverse event reporting requirements under the Materiovigilance Programme of India (MvPI). The move is aimed at bolstering patient safety and enhancing the post-market surveillance ecosystem for medical devices across India.
Source: h7.cl/1o2WQ

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. we hope you enjoy reading it.

1. India’s Ministry of Consumer Affairs has set a timeline for compliance with amendments to the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. Changes to labelling provisions will be enforced on either January 1st or July 1st, after a minimum 180-day transition period from notification. The revised rules mandate clear, legible, and standardized labels on packaged goods, ensuring consumers have key details such as net quantity, MRP, manufacturing date, country of origin, and manufacturer information. This move is aimed at enhancing consumer protection, business ease, and reducing compliance burdens for industry stakeholders.
Source: bit.ly/3CxjgRQ

2. The Supreme Court of India ruled that domicile-based reservation for postgraduate medical admissions under State Quotas violates the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. However, the Court clarified that the judgment will not impact existing domicile reservations or affect students currently studying or who have already graduated under such categories.
Source: bit.ly/4juOHwG

3. India’s Central medical devices regulator, Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has issued a draft standard In-Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) evaluation protocol to evaluate the quality and performance of IVD’s. The protocol once approved will be used by IVD manufacturers testing labs in India. Public comments are invited on the draft standard before March 15, 2025.
Source: bit.ly/3QhIAyF

4. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has confirmed the addition of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to the country’s Universal Immunization Program (UIP), a major step in preventing cervical cancer, which is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women in India. While the vaccine’s inclusion in the UIP has been officially announced, the exact timeline for its roll-out has yet to be determined. The move aims to combat cervical cancer by offering free vaccination to girls aged 9-14 years.
Source: bit.ly/3WHhkgp

5. China has approved its first stem cell therapy for commercial use, despite mixed clinical trial results. The therapy is intended for patients with neurological disorders, including spinal cord injuries. The approval has raised concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the treatment, as the trials showed only limited evidence of efficacy, and there are calls for more rigorous oversight in stem cell-based treatments.
Source: bit.ly/3WI0Uoa

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. we hope you enjoy reading it.

1. India’s Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) has issued a Show Cause Notice to Producers, Importers, and Brand Owners (PIBOs) of Plastic Packaging for non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016. PIBOs must file their Annual Report and pay Annual Processing Charges for the FY 2023-24 to fulfill their Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) obligations by 30th November 2024 to avoid levying of environmental compensation under the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986.
Source: bit.ly/3Zs0XWY

2. India’s Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has amended ITC (HS) 2022, Schedule-I (Import Policy), to align the latest tariff schedules and the Finance Act 2024 (No. 2 of 2024). The changes include updates to ITC (HS) codes through additions, deletions, amendments, splits, and mergers, aimed at streamlining import regulations, clarifying compliance standards, and fostering ease of doing business in international trade.
Source: bit.ly/3ZrYaNm

3. India’s Allahabad High Court has ruled that under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSS Act 2006), an offence will be considered to have occurred when the food analyst’s report confirming the violation is received, rather than when the food sample was collected by the Food Safety Officer. The ruling clarifies the timeline for initiating legal action under the Act.
Source: bit.ly/3Vc5hqA

4. India’s Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has issued an advisory informing taxpayers about the launch of a new e-Services app, replacing the old e-Invoice QR Code Verifier app. The new app offers features like scanning QR codes to verify B2B e-invoices, provides GSTIN search functionality and most up-to-date information regarding approved B2B e-Invoice.
Source: bit.ly/4i7crX3

5. The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) of Singapore has taken action to combat the illegal sale and distribution of health products by removing over 3,000 unauthorized health products listings from local e-commerce and social media platforms. In the course of this operation, the authority has issued 1,471 warnings to sellers in an effort to safeguard consumers from substandard or counterfeit products.
Source: bit.ly/4ic7gF8

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

1. India’s Department of Consumer Affairs has requested comments from stakeholders regarding the declaration of units of measurement for the net quantity of food wrapping paper and aluminum foils used for carrying food products. The proposal suggests including both “weight” and dimensions (length x breadth), i.e., kg and meters x meters (or cm x cm), rather than only weight or dimensions. This proposal aims to inform consumers about the actual quantity of packing material delivered.
Source: bit.ly/3Yld47H

2. The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC), under India’s Health Ministry, has released an updated Medical Device Adverse Event Reporting Form for the reporting of Medical Device Adverse Events (MDAEs). The form states that reporting any MDAE will not have any legal implications for the reporter, and the reporter’s identity will be protected and kept strictly confidential.
Source: bit.ly/3XYGbwc

3. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoH&FW) is considering a proposal to amend the timelines for conducting audits and verifying compliance for grant of manufacturing license for medical devices in India. Currently, the Medical Devices Rules, 2017, do not specify these timelines, leading to delays in Quality Management System (QMS) inspections and the subsequent compliance verification processes.
Source: bit.ly/3ZXbr12

4. India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoH&FW) is considering a proposal to restrict the eligibility requirements for qualifying as a competent person for obtaining a wholesale license for the sale, stocking, exhibition, or distribution of drugs in India to those with a pharmacy background, specifically D. Pharmacy, B. Pharmacy, M. Pharmacy, Pharm D, or individuals who are Registered Pharmacists.
Source: bit.ly/3ZXbr12

5. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoH&FW) is considering a proposal to ensure mandatory reporting of Serious Adverse Events (SAE) related to medical devices, including In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices, by the manufacturer or importer of these devices in India. Currently, under the Medical Devices Rules 2017, there is no mandatory requirement for reporting such events by the license holder.
Source: bit.ly/3ZXbr12

Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it

1. The Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC) and India’s Central Drug Authority (CDSCO) have released Version 2.0 of the “Pharmacovigilance Guidance Document for Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) of Pharmaceutical Products” wherein they have extended the timelines to report non-serious adverse events within 90 calendar days from the previous proposed timelines of 30 days.
Source: bit.ly/4dctGCs

2. Drugs Consultative Committee (DCC), which advises the Central and State Governments on uniform implementation of drug laws in India, has reportedly advised all the State Licensing Authorities (SLA) to ensure that all applications are exclusively received and processed through the Online National Drugs License System (ONDLS) portal only.
Source: bit.ly/4ejO8Tr

3. The Federal Court of Australia has heavily penalized and ordered one of the leading manufacturers and suppliers of medical devices for unlawfully supplying Infuse Bone Graft Kit without LT Cage. The Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) prevents the supply of Infuse Bone Graft Kit without LT Cage.
Source: bit.ly/3XChUMd
Source: bit.ly/4dlv5H1

4. The World Health Organization (WHO) has released guidance on best practices for clinical trials to improve the design, conduct, and oversight of clinical trials in countries of all income levels. The guidance provides recommendations to the national health authorities, regulatory authorities, funders, and others on how to facilitate clinical trials to generate evidence on health interventions in addition to practical concerns.
Source: bit.ly/47Fc0hI
Source: bit.ly/4ezzQxN

5. India’s Central Drug Licensing Authority has reportedly introduced new guidelines to lower the frequency of drug testing for imports from nations like the US, Australia, Japan, Canada, and the European Union, to one sample from every two years’ worth of consignments or one sample out of every 20 consecutive consignments, whichever occurs first provided the drug samples maintain a clean record with no quality failures in the last five years.
Source: bit.ly/3Bgacjo

Posted on

Timelines for obtaining import license for medical devices including IVD’s in India

The import of medical devices including in-vitro medical devices (hereinafter referred to as “medical devices”) in India is regulated by India’s central medical device regulator, the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). In order to import a medical device into India, the importer has to make an application for import license Form MD-14 of Medical Devices Rules, 2017 (MDR, 2017) before CDSCO. Once the application is processed successfully, the CDSCO grants an import license to the importer in Form MD-15 of MDR, 2017.

Since 1st April 2020, all medical devices (including its accessories and components) are regulated as drugs in India. An import license has been made mandatory to import medical devices depending on its risk classification from the following dates:

  • For Class A and Class B medical devices: 1st October 2022
  • For Class C and Class D medical devices: 1st October 2023

In the paragraphs below, we have answered some of the common questions regarding timelines for obtaining import license for medical devices on the basis of our working knowledge of the law and prevailing practice.

1.  What is the usual time within which an import licence may be granted by CDSCO?

The prescribed timeline for issuance of import license is nine (09) months from the date of application. However, the timeline is suspended if a query on the application is raised by CDSCO.

2. What is the approximate timeline for receiving query from CDSCO on the import license application?

As per current estimate, a query is typically received within a span of 3-4 months from the date of import license application. Please note that CDSCO may raise multiple rounds of queries.

3. How much time does an applicant of import license gets to reply to the queries?

The general expectation of CDSCO is that the queries should be responded within forty-five days from the date of receipt of queries.

4. What happens if a query cannot be responded within 45 days?

If the applicant is facing a difficulty in replying to the query, an intimation may be sent to CDSCO justifying the reason for delay and providing appropriate undertaking.

5. What is the maximum time within which queries have to be responded?

There is no official time limit for responding to the queries which has been stipulated by CDSCO. However, the expectation is to respond to the queries within the reasonable time frame.

6. What is the timeline by which the response to the queries is processed by CSDCO?

There is no prescribed timeline for processing the queries by CDSCO. However, the timeline for grant of import licence is nine (09) months from the date of filing of the application.

7. Is the time taken by the authorities to grant an import licence includes the time taken by the importer to respond to the queries?

No. The total timeline of nine months prescribed for grant of import license is not inclusive of the time taken by the importer to respond to the queries.

8. What is the time limit in which the importer can appeal to the Central Government in case the application is rejected by CSDCO?

If the application is rejected by CDSCO, the applicant may appeal to the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare within a period of forty-five days. The Secretary or another officer designated by the Secretary may, after conducting an enquiry into the matter as considered necessary, pass orders in relation to the appeal within a period of ninety days from the date of appeal.

9. What is the validity of import license granted in Form MD-15?

The licence granted by CDSCO under Form MD-15 is valid in perpetuity unless cancelled or surrendered. The validity of the license so granted is subject to the payment of the retention fee by the importer.

10. When is importer license retention fee due to be paid?

The retention fee to retain import license has to be paid by the importer every 5 years.

11. What if the importer of medical device fails to pay the retention fee within the prescribed time period?

If the import licence holder fails to pay the required retention fee on or before the prescribed due date, the license holder is required to pay a late fee in addition to the retention fee.

The late fee will be calculated at the rate of two per cent (2%) of the import license retention fee for every month or part thereof within ninety days. Non-payment of fee until expiry of ninety days will result in cancellation of the import license.

For any business-related queries please write to contact@arogyalegal.com