Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Reader, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

Supreme Court clarifies when a patient’s negligence may be reduced due to pre-existing conditions
India’s Supreme Court has laid down the situations in which a patient’s claim for compensation due to medical negligence may be reduced on the grounds of pre-existing conditions. These are: First, when a latent condition of the patient has been unearthed; Second, when the negligence on the part of the wrongdoer re-activates a patient’s pre-existing condition that had subsided due to treatment; Third, wrongdoer’s actions aggravate known, pre-existing conditions, that have not yet received medical attention; and Fourth, when the wrongdoer’s actions accelerate an inevitable disability or loss of life due to a condition possessed by the patient even when the eventuality would have occurred with time, in the absence of the wrongdoer’s actions. This rule is commonly referred to as the ‘egg-shell skull’ rule.
Revised penalty will apply, even if the offence took place before the penalty is revised: Supreme Court
India’s Supreme Court has held that a repealed provision will cease to operate from the date of repeal and the substituted provision will commence to operate from the date of its substitution. The Court was dealing with a matter involving the determination of penalty for loss of liquor in transit. The unamended rule, which existed at the time when the breach happened, provided for a penalty of four times the duty payable on liquor.  The amended rule provided for a penalty equal to the duty payable on liquor. Since no additional guidance for the application of the amended rule was prescribed, the Supreme Court held that the amended penalty provision would apply.
Proceedings related to alcohol content in drugs under excise laws and drug laws can run concurrently: High Court
India’s Gujarat High Court has clarified that action under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act does not exempt an individual from prosecution if a case is made out under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. In this case, a pharmaceutical manufacturer had allegedly violated the State’s prohibition law by selling intoxicating substances as ayurvedic medicine and, therefore, was facing action against the excise laws as well as drug laws.
Limits on the import of Isopropyl alcohol relaxed
India’s Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has notified the discontinuation of safeguard measures on the import of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) through a trade notice. Earlier, country-wise quantitative restrictions (QR) were imposed on the import of IPA into India.
Used imported medical devices with a minimum shelf life of 5 years are not waste: Tribunal
India’s Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that used medical devices with a minimum residual life of 5 years or more are not e-waste or hazardous waste. In this matter, a hospital had imported used medical equipment for internal use but the Customs had seized the capital equipment on grounds that the used medical equipment qualified as hazardous waste under the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016
Posted on

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Reader, We are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

Delay condonation should be evaluated based on reasons provided and not merits of case: Supreme Court
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court held that in condoning delay for a filing for which limitation period has been stipulated under the Limitation Act, 1963, a Court should not base its decision on whether such delay has been condoned in a similar matter, evaluating delay on merits of the fact situation, but rather each delay should be evaluated on the grounds pleaded in the application for its condonation.
Source: bit.ly/49MllnH

Central Government to take strict action against non-compliance with quality maintenance in manufacture of fire-resistant fabrics raw material
The Indian Central Government is intending to take stringent action against violators of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Quality Control Order for raw material used to manufacture fire-resistant fabric used in upholstery used in commercial spaces such as cinema halls, conference halls etc. Pursuant to issue of this Quality Control Order, only those raw material that have been certified by the BIS may be used in manufacture of commercial space upholstery. However, this Quality Control Order does not apply to upholstery used in households or those manufactured for export.
Source: bit.ly/4cKT4R3

Indian Government partners with Quality Council of India to improve services at Central Government run hospitals
India’s Central Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Quality Council of India, to help improve quality standards for healthcare delivery at government run hospitals and help the hospitals get accredited by the National Accreditation Body for Hospitals/ Laboratories.
Source: bit.ly/3Ub0ful

Prices of imported Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient see sharp decline due to action against cartelized manufacturers
Despite an increase in demand in the Indian domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing sector for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), indicated by a 39% increase in year-on-year imports, the price of APIs being imported from China and other countries has reduced significantly to pre-COVID levels. This reduction is suspected to be caused by breaking-down of manufacturing cartels. This reduction in prices of API signifies an increase in profit margins for Indian firms which have traditionally been depended on Chinese imports.
Source: bit.ly/43Qlo0d

ECHR holds that inaction against climate change may be considered violation of human rights
The European Court of Human Rights has issued an award in favour of several Switzerland based petitioners who brought claims against their Government. The Court held that the European Convention on Human Rights envisages citizens right to be protected by their government against adverse effects of climate change. The petitioners had claimed that the inaction of the Swiss government and insufficient mitigation measures had caused a violation of the petitioners’ human rights, since such inaction by the government has increased their likelihood of dying of heat stroke.
Source: bit.ly/3JbMLZ6