TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Readers, we are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. we hope you enjoy reading it.

1. The Delhi High Court has restrained pharma company from using the trademark “Liv 333” for their liver-care product, finding it deceptively similar to established registered trademark “Liv.52” from 1957. The court noted that merely adding numerals doesn’t eliminate consumer confusion.
Source: bit.ly/44lGKV5

2. In the dispute over Geographical Indication between Chile and Peru over the alcoholic beverage “Pisco”, the Delhi High Court ruled that both nations have legitimate claims and no exclusive rights can be claimed, therefore, in order to prevent consumer confusion, each must use geographic labels, “Peruvian PISCO” and “Chilean PISCO”.
Source: bit.ly/4nJfqYI

3. India’s Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), has warned e-commerce platforms to strictly comply with food safety norms or face action. Key mandates include displaying FSSAI licenses, revealing warehouse details on FoSCoS, training food handlers via FoSTaC, uploading hygiene photos, and showing expiry dates online.
Source: bit.ly/3TsiWsz

4. During a consultation with NITI Aayog, MSME pharma associations sought regulatory and financial support for compliance with revised GMP norms, requesting deadline extensions and infrastructure aid, while the DCGI emphasized strict enforcement and responsibility for upholding quality standards.
Source: bit.ly/40GWTSJ

5. The Indian pharmaceutical sector faces legal and regulatory concerns due to high humidity altering the colour, smell, and taste of medicines, risking non-compliance with quality standards. Experts recommend compressed air dryers to ensure pharmaceutical products meet statutory purity and safety requirements.
Source: bit.ly/4nCEH6v

TOP 5 HEALTH LAWS AND POLICY UPDATES

Dear Reader, We are happy to share the most interesting legal and policy updates concerning health industry that we read today. We hope you enjoy reading it.

Guidelines to differentiate brand extension from surrogate advertising issued
In a meeting with stakeholders, the Department of Consumer Affairs (DoCA) has clarified the difference between brand extension advertisements which are permitted, and surrogate advertisements which are not permitted. A brand extension advertisement should not contain direct or indirect references to prohibited products. It should also not use colour, layout, or presentations associated with the prohibited products.
Source: bit.ly/42PKVGk

Draft Pharmacovigilance Guidance Document published for comments
A draft of the revised Pharmacovigilance Guidance Document for Marketing Authorization Holders (MAHs) of Pharmaceutical Products has been published for comments. The last date for providing comments is March 23, 2024. This guidance document facilitates MAHs to setup & implementation of uniform Pharmacovigilance System for pharmaceutical products in the Indian market in the post-licensure period.
Source: bit.ly/3SSrfgw

Many small and medium pharmaceutical manufacturing units have been ordered shut down after increased surveillance
India’s central drug regulator, Central Drugs and Standards Control Organization (CDSCO), and state-level drug licensing authorities have reportedly issued show-cause notices to several drug small and medium manufacturers in the State of Punjab and Himachal Pradesh on grounds of poor quality control, and have also directed some of them to stop manufacturing.
Source: bit.ly/3I88UqP

Pharma MNCs exit domestic market due to regulatory headwinds
Many multinational pharmaceutical companies are reportedly cutting back on operations and manufacturing in India as part of a global strategic review due to regulatory headwinds on account of price control, rising costs, competition, and unfavourable intellectual property climate.
Source: bit.ly/42PaWW9

Frozen embryos should be treated as children: US Court
The Alabama State Supreme Court has ruled that frozen embryos in test tubes should be treated as ‘children’. This ruling has forced in vitro fertilization (IVF) providers in Alabama to stop treating patients, raising questions about the procedure’s continued availability in the state.
Source: bit.ly/3I8T4vR